Cardarine raises a handful of sensible questions. This page answers them in order, starting with the fundamentals and moving to applications.
This page was last updated on 2026-08-01 and is reviewed periodically as new material appears.
The compound is typically described as a laboratory compound rather than a therapeutic product. Published reports have explored its role in lipid disorders, insulin sensitivity, and exercise metabolism, yet no major drug regulator has approved it for medical use. Commercial samples sold under the cardarine name may vary in purity and identity. Analytical confirmation is therefore necessary when the material is discussed in scientific or regulatory contexts. Its classification as a prohibited substance in sport further shapes how it is studied and reported.
Cardarine is a common name for GW501516, a synthetic compound studied for its effects on lipid and glucose metabolism. It functions as an agonist at peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor delta, or PPARδ, a nuclear receptor that influences gene expression. The molecule is not a steroid, nor is it a selective androgen receptor modulator. It is also known in research and sports literature as GW-501516 and endurobol. Early laboratory work examined its metabolic activity in cell cultures and animal models.
Analytical laboratories typically identify cardarine and its metabolites using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Urine is a common matrix in anti-doping testing, while blood and tissue may be used in research settings. Detection windows depend on the assay, the sample matrix, and the compound's metabolism. Because cardarine is extensively metabolized, laboratories often target specific metabolites to improve sensitivity and confirmation. Reference standards are required for reliable quantification. Method validation includes checks for selectivity, linearity, and carryover.
A persistent misconception is that cardarine is a fat-burning drug or a safe alternative to anabolic steroids. No approved therapeutic product exists, and human safety data are limited. The tumor findings in rodents remain a central concern in scientific reviews. Products sold online may contain inaccurate labels, impurities, or different compounds entirely, which complicates any assessment of effects. Independent testing of such products has reported frequent mislabeling. For these reasons, discussions in the literature emphasize risks and unknowns rather than benefits.
| Property | Value | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Chemical class | Synthetic PPARδ agonist | Not a steroid or a selective androgen receptor modulator. |
| Common synonyms | Cardarine, GW501516, GW-501516, endurobol | Names vary by supplier and literature source. |
| Appearance | White to off-white powder | Consistent with many small-molecule research chemicals. |
| Solubility | Low in water; soluble in DMSO and ethanol | Often prepared in organic solvent for laboratory work. |
| Primary target | PPARδ (NR1C2) | Nuclear receptor involved in lipid and energy metabolism. |
Different conformations of PrPSc (often termed prion "strains") are thought to cause the distinct subtypes of prion disease, explaining variations in clinical features and progression. They are thought to affect signaling processes, damaging neurons and resulting in degeneration that causes the spongiform appearance in the affected brain. Other forms of TSEs that are found in humans are Gerstmann–Sträussler–Scheinker syndrome, fatal familial insomnia, kuru, and variably protease-sensitive prionopathy. Susceptibility and disease phenotype are influenced by a common polymorphism at codon 129 of the PRNP gene (methionine/valine). Notably, individuals homozygous at codon 129 are over-represented in sporadic CJD cases and tend to have shorter incubation periods.
Due to the reliance on most principles of the basic science of Biochemistry, early contemporary physicians were informally qualified to perform research on their own in mainly this (today also related biomedical sciences) field.
The words protein, polypeptide, and peptide are a little ambiguous and can overlap in meaning. Protein is generally used to refer to the complete biological molecule in a stable conformation, whereas peptide is generally reserved for a short amino acid oligomers often lacking a stable 3D structure. But the boundary between the two is not well defined and usually lies near 20–30 residues. Proteins can interact with many types of molecules and ions, including with other proteins, with lipids, with carbohydrates, and with DNA.
As for Thrombotic disease, there have been several attempts to identify the contribution of α2β1-related genes to the development of this disorder. For example, polymorphisms in the ITGA2 gene can influence the density of α2β1 receptors in the platelet membrane, thus affecting the interaction of platelets with collagen and, consequently, their ability to form thrombi. However, the relationship of the described polymorphisms to myocardial infarction or ischemic stroke was rather inconsistent. It has also been reported that ITGA2 can be used as a biomarker for the diagnosis and prognosis of diseases. Overexpression of the ITGA2 gene is correlated with worse outcomes of several types of cancers, which implies the possibility of predicting aggressiveness, metastasis and survival based on the expression of this protein. With further development of transcriptomics and proteomics studies, ITGA2 was recognized as one of the candidates for a biomarker of disease progression and evaluation of the effect of targeted therapies. Since this integrin is responsible for many pathologies, it has become an attractive target for therapy. Monoclonal antibodies, peptides, and other molecules were developed to inhibit the functions of integrin α2β1 related to binding of cells to extracellular matrix components and subsequent signal transduction. However, there are no specific therapeutic agents targeting integrin α2β1 currently available for clinical use.
Sources: en.wikipedia.org
==== Phase I ==== The clinical trial Phase I began on 15-16 August at Hanoi Medical University. Phase I was conducted on 100 healthy volunteers randomly assigned in a ratio of 3:1, i.e. 75% of them received the ARCT-154 vaccine and 25% received a placebo. The primary objective of the phase one trial was to assess safety and immunogenicity of the vaccine. Volunteers will receive 2 doses of ARCT-154 vaccine or placebo, 28 days apart. Data of the volunteers from the first dose (day 1) to 7 days after the second dose (day 36), will be evaluated by the research team. Phase I report on the safety of the ARCT-154 vaccine was approved by the Ethics Committee on 20 September 2021. Preliminary results show that the ARCT-154 vaccine is safe in healthy volunteers.
In 1942, the Nationalists conducted a major fiscal reorganization by abolishing provincial budgets and centralizing financial control, a move that ironically led to many local administrations relying even less on the central government because they had lost funding. These local administrations were forced to turn to other measures to support themselves. Liu Wenhui, who had already been involved in the opium trade prior to 1942, now faced the loss of his stipend from both the central government and the Sichuanese provincial government. Liu's budgetary situation had already been precarious: in 1939, Xikang's expenditures were around 5.4 million yuan, but non-opium income only amounted to 1.4 million yuan. Liu began growing opium on a systematic scale around the early 1940s. He instituted taxes on opium, taxes for not growing opium (the "laziness tax"), taxes on the import, export, and sale of opium, and "red light" taxes on opium dens. After 1942, each county in Xikang was assigned an annual tax quota of at least 100 dan (160,000 liang), with total revenues estimated at at least 3-4,000 dan. The price per liang of opium was one to two silver dollars in Xikang and three to four dollars in the Sichuan basin, not counting shortages. During the communist era, when opium consumption was strictly prohibited, Liu admitted that his strategy was one of "drinking poison to quench thirst." However, he blamed Chiang Kai-shek for forcing him into a situation where he had no other choice but to cultivate, trade, and tax opium.
=== Institutional review boards (IRBs) === Approval by an Institutional Review Board (IRB), or Independent Ethics Committee (IEC), is necessary before all but the most informal research can begin. In commercial clinical trials, the study protocol is not approved by an IRB before the sponsor recruits sites to conduct the trial. However, the study protocol and procedures have been tailored to fit generic IRB submission requirements. In this case, and where there is no independent sponsor, each local site investigator submits the study protocol, the consent(s), the data collection forms, and supporting documentation to the local IRB. Universities and most hospitals have in-house IRBs. Other researchers (such as in walk-in clinics) use independent IRBs. The IRB scrutinizes the study both for medical safety and for protection of the patients involved in the study, before it allows the researcher to begin the study. It may require changes in study procedures or in the explanations given to the patient. A required yearly "continuing review" report from the investigator updates the IRB on the progress of the study and any new safety information related to the study.
Sources: en.wikipedia.org
Cardarine is a common name for GW501516, a synthetic PPARδ agonist. It is not a steroid or a selective androgen receptor modulator. It was developed and studied as a research compound for metabolic pathways.
It binds to and activates PPARδ, a nuclear receptor that regulates genes related to fatty acid oxidation and energy use. This activation alters transcription in tissues such as skeletal muscle and liver. The full range of downstream effects in humans is not fully established.
No, cardarine is not known to occur naturally in plants, animals, or humans. It is a synthetic molecule produced for laboratory research. Products labeled as cardarine should therefore be treated as manufactured chemicals with variable purity.
No. Cardarine has not received approval for human therapeutic use in major jurisdictions. It remains an investigational compound.